![]() Saurabh Jain's tall frame and cheerful demeanour embody the omnipotent yet impish God he is supposed to portray. Also, the dull political subplot involving the corrupt Govindarajulu (Rao Ramesh) and Krishnamma's flashback involving a completely unnecessary Jagapathi Babu are neither revelatory of the characters nor enrich the narrative. For they have tried to cram every little contribution of Bhavaji into the story, and that makes this feel like a glorified documentary at times. The makers gathered enormous information about Hathiram Bhavaji, but instead of benefitting from that, the film suffers from it. Bharavi's dialogues with poetic ambitions get too cheesy too often. The film is so content with the glorification of the central character that it overestimates the impact of those scenes that overstay their welcome. The emotions do not click in this overtly fabricated drama that is clever enough to take liberties with the story but not brave enough to venture a little too far in that direction. And that explains to you what didn't work out this time. This montage, peppered by Keeravani's devotionally charged tunes, is so soothing and powerful that it outshines the preceding and succeeding bland scenes. There is an excellent two-minute montage of Rama being immersed in reading the sthala-puraanam of Tirumala, handed over to him by Krishnamma (Anushka Shetty), and He is all over the lush scenery around the temple, relishing it. Keeravani however compensates for the lack of that advantage here with the background score, that thematically rhymes with Gopal Reddy's grandiose and scenic shots of the Tirumala hillsides. In the latter films' case, it is perhaps because we already knew Annamacharya keerthanas and Ramadasu songs even before those films came out, and the music had a familiarity to build on, that the popular songs had it easy. He visits Tirumala, and eventually becomes Hathiram Bhavaji.Īs is the norm, there are songs at every turn, but only a few stand out just like in Annamayya or Ramadasu. When it later dawns upon him, he repents, and is now even more desperate to again meet Him. Rama doesn't recognize Him and shoos Him away. Rama (Nagarjuna) is hell bent on seeing God, and is advised by his guru (Sai Kumar) to do a tapassu (penance). And it robs you of your painful wait for the ultimate redemption. God appears too easy, too soon and too frequently. There is an enchanting chemistry between God and the devotee, but there is no conflict. When Ramadasu finally dares the Lord singing "evadabba sommani kulukuthu tirigevu ramachandra", you marvel at the enigmatic silence of God that doesn't mind his dying devotee. Hathiram Bhavaji's story, despite being heavily fictionalized, doesn't have much dramatic appeal. And Nagarjuna doesn't disappoint this time either.īut there is only so much that a performance can shoulder when the drama is crippled. In all the earlier films (barring Shirdi Sai, in which he plays the saint instead of devotee), his momentary separation from the Almighty and his eventual suffering never simply stood as a show of his prowess but also evoked a deep empathy in the viewers. ![]() Nagarjuna's tearful eyes have their own way of portraying boundless adulation and borderline-destructive obsession towards his beloved God. ![]() But be it the evergreen Annamayya or the almost equally good Sri Ramadasu, what outshined all this desperate glamourization and blatant exaggeration is how consistently excellently Nagarjuna fleshed out his performances every time. A slightly revisionist take of devotee dramas that are very conscious and cautious of the commercial appeal and narrative tautness needed, to the extent that they never shied away from comedy tracks, cleavages and the timeless fruits-on-the-navel routine. ![]() ![]() The Nagarjuna - Raghavendra Rao devotional films have become a genre unto themselves. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |